Marijuana Case Goes Up In Smoke On Appeal

The Appellate Division expands illegal search and seizure law in the marijuana possession and intent to distribute case; titled State v. Pompa. On July 2, 2010, the Court held that while a NJ State Trooper had sufficient probable cause to search a tractor trailer he lawfully stopped on the side of a highway, the 30 pounds of marijuana and other evidence found during the search had to be suppressed. Although the Trooper had a right under the closely regulated administrative inspection exception to the warrant requirement, the Prosecutors did not demonstrate that the trooper had exigent circumstances required by New Jersey under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement.

What this means is even if an officer searches your car, they must still demonstrate that there are exigent circumstance that could lead to the destruction of evidence if the officer was delayed by the fact that he had to obtain a telephonic warrant or warrant in person. It is important to remember, that even if the police find drugs, guns or other contraband on you, you may still have a viable defense to your charges if you were illegally stopped or illegally searched. If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact me at the Law Office of Thomas Hugh Martin, LLC by either telephone (732) 687-6302 or through our website www.jerseycriminallawyer.com.
 

Drug Arrest Follows Equipment Violation

LAKEHURST, NJ: A resident of Toms River was arrested and charged with N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10 and N.J.S.A. 2C:36-2, which are possession of less than 50 grams of marijuana and possession of paraphernalia after being stopped for an equipment violation due to a broken tail light early Thursday morning along Route 70.

Police said the man was pulled over by Ptl. Jeffrey Emmons at 1:35 a.m. As the officer approached the car he smelled burnt marijuana. Under search and seizure law, if the tail light was broken, the cops had a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle for an equipment infraction. Thereafter, there was probable cause to search the vehicle under the "plain smell" doctrine. However, to truly determine if the search and finding of the marijuana was valid, one would have to view the police reports. If there is an issue with the legality of the search, the man can file a Notice of Motion to Suppress Evidence.


 

Wall Resident Arrested For Marijuana.

Wall- Police officers arrested a Wall resident, age 32, on Tuesday for N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10, possession less than 50 grams of marijuana and N.J.S.A. 2C:36-2 drug paraphernalia. Police arrested the man at around 2:00 a.m. on Tuesday morning. The police allegedly were responding to a report of a suspicious person on or about 18th Avenue. The article was unclear as to how the police found the marijuana and paraphernalia. As set forth in the illegal search category of this blog, if the stop was not based upon a reasonable and articulable suspicion and there was no probable cause to search the individual or his property, the Wall resident could have the drugs and paraphernalia suppressed in court.